One of the toughest parts of being the author of a book about racial reconciliation is that when the latest racial incident flares up, everyone expects you to chime in with your two cents. I’m feeling a bit penniless on this current one, but here goes anyway.
The “current one” I’m talking about is the controversy surrounding a new book from Zondervan called Deadly Viper Character Assassins: A Kung Fu Survival Guide for Life & Leadership. The book, which was coauthored by Mike Foster and Jud Wilhite, uses images, symbols, and caricatures of Asian culture as a light-hearted vehicle for getting at the heavy issues of Christian integrity and character. Not surprisingly, the book has upset a fair number of Asian American Christians, as well as many of us who are not Asian but who identify with the pain felt by our brothers and sisters who are offended by the book’s use of stereotypical imagery and caricatures.
The book is clearly meant to be a fun exploration of character and leadership, and it has been praised by many for its fresh insights and clever presentation. But it appears the authors have inadvertently stumbled into thorny and treacherous territory that they did not know existed; they were simply trying to dispense timeless wisdom in a timely and accessible way. Well, now they know.
Ironically, one would think the book’s publisher, Zondervan, would’ve better anticipated the Asian community’s reaction to the book, given an earlier controversy that followed the publication of a book from its Youth Specialties branch. In that episode, Zondervan and Youth Specialities took heroic measures to publicly apologize and correct the offense at a considerable financial cost. Hopefully, this latest episode will have a similarly redemptive conclusion. Yet, I wonder if things could’ve been handled differently earlier on.
My friend Soong-Chan Rah, who has become one of the evangelical church’s most vocal (and effective) activists on these types of issues, inspired this latest movement with his initial blog posts about the Deadly Viper book and a promotional video on Facebook. Soong-Chan’s open letter to the authors and Zondervan is quite provocative. But what’s most fascinating, and perhaps even instructive, is the slew of comments related to Soong-Chan’s posts, as well as an evolving thread over at the Deadly Viper blog.
I must confess that I’m not totally comfortable with the way the protest has played out so far. It’s not that I disagree with the gist of it. I think it’s important to call attention to these types of things, especially when they’re happening within the Christian community. However, my initial impression is that the high level of “shock and awe” that Soong-Chan and others have brought to this issue probably has been a bit overwhelming and confusing for Foster and Wilhite (though I think Zondervan should’ve seen it coming). Maybe I’m just feeling a little squeamish about this necessary phase of protest. I know that hard and unpleasant honesty must often precede genuine dialogue, repentance, and reconciliation. Still, I get the sense that Foster and Wilhite had no clue that their earnest effort to create something entertaining and edifying would be perceived as being wrongheaded and insensitive by so many. I’m sure it wasn’t even on their radar that appropriating Asian culture carried with it an obligation to “take it seriously.” They were simply parroting the stereotypes and jokes that are now so common in American pop culture.
Parodying Asian culture has become so commonplace in America that many of us naturally assume that the Asian community is in on the joke. When I was a child, I would watch Hong Kong Phooey every Saturday morning. Every kid on the playground wanted to be Bruce Lee. The Karate Kid movies ruled in the ’80s. Last year Kung Fu Panda made hundreds of millions at the box office. And fried rice, egg rolls, and sushi are just as “American” as French fries, pizza, and tacos.
We take it all for granted, and I would surmise that many white Americans believe that Asians are now so assimilated into American life that they have no problem with the tongue-in-cheek references to their various cultural heritages. Asians, after all, are a peaceful people. They’re certainly not as hyper-sensitive about race as (for instance) African Americans are. There are no Asian American Jesse Jacksons or Al Sharptons—at least not any who show up on our televisions complaining about something every other night.
So, it must be rather jarring for some people to discover that 21st-century Asians can feel as marginalized and disrespected as other minority groups in America.
But, again, I don’t want to ascribe any ill intent to Mike Foster, Jud Wilhite, and their book. I believe they innocently waded into these choppy waters. As a published author, I know the excitement of coming up with a good idea, toiling over the computer to get the words just right, seeing your publisher get behind your vision, watching as the design team comes up with a great cover and the marketing team develops a winning campaign. Ah, and nothing compares to that day when your finished book finally arrives. Holding it, staring at it, flipping through its crisp pages is pretty much all you’re physically and mentally able to do those first few hours after receiving it. And when it’s a Christian book, featuring a message that you’ve prayed God would use to influence and transform lives, there’s just nothing that compares to this.
Deadly Vipers is a beautiful little book. It’s designed and packaged with superb creativity, and the content is the kind of relevant stuff that Christian leaders and laypeople everywhere need to hear. I’m hoping the outcry against the book’s cultural blind spots will be tempered by grace and humility and empathy. I really resonate with this post at the Next Gener.Asian Church blog.
Think about what Foster and Wilhite must be feeling right now. Over the last year or two, they’ve invested their lives into this little book. They hoped and prayed that it would help others, but now they’re feeling attacked by a passionate movement of folks whom they probably assumed would be on their side. I’m sure this has been an eye-opening experience for them. I’m sure there’s something for all of us to learn.
Update: An encouraging post at Soong-Chan’s blog this morning:
I have heard indirectly, that Mike Foster will be engaging in a direct phone conversation with several Asian-Americans about ways to progress forward. This is very good news. As far as I know, this will be the first attempt by Mike Foster to engage in a direct dialogue with those who find the material problematic. Please be in prayer for this conversation and for ensuing conversations.
Let’s pray for a positive outcome.
Ed, when 1 Corinthians 13 speaks about “love believes all things” it is about giving folks the benefit of the doubt. As you know, when you are wounded, this is a really difficult thing to do.
I appreciate your perspective on this and words. They come with credibility and grace. I also agree with the tenor of your approach, appreciate especially the concept of squeamishness around some of the “necessary” part of protest. I agree.
As believers called to reconciliation we ought often to remember that as Romans says “God’s kindness is meant to lead [us] to repentance”. you show this in suggesting we consider the agonizing state of the writers. . . obviously we must also consider the state of those who are continually marginalized as well. . .
Ed, I truly appreciate your words on this matter. I studied this book with our college Sunday School class a year ago and we all LOVED it. In fact, many of our students (male and female) have borrowed our book to lead their own studies on it with their classmates and dorm-mates.
I understand the concern, but disagree with it. I’m sensitive to issues like these. As a Caucasian American I find the Cleveland Indians’ name and logo offensive.
If any of the information was presented in anything that seemed to be “racist”, I would have been offended.
But this book just presented it’s case in an “old school kung fu movie” style. Would anyone come to the defense of white folks if the book had been staged among white cowboys in the old west? That’s just as much a caricature as the kung fu movie imagery.
I also fully acknowledge that I am not Asian American and don’t have any insight into how old school kung fu movies or the imagery presented in this book might make our Asian brothers and sisters feel.
@ Edward:
Thanks for weighing in. I have deeply appreciated “Reconciliation Blues” and I believe your voice is significant in this ongoing conversation. As an Asian American follower of Jesus, I too am hoping for a grace-filled, redemptive outcome.
@ Ryan:
Your reaction as a non-Asian American is understandable to me. However, once it becomes clear that a great number of fellow sisters & brothers in Christ have been deeply wounded by this, I would hope that it leads to understanding and empathy from you. In fact, there was a similar comment on the Deadly Viper blog that describes this process (sorry for the long quotation here, but I think it’s important):
“I first heard about this issue via a tweet that sent me to Prof. Rah’s blog. When I first read the email exchange, I honestly could sympathize with Mike’s response to him. Rah seemed a bit too blunt and sounded like one of those people who just likes to complain about stuff, so I can understand why Mike essentially dismissed him. I can also understand why the authors used the imagery and marketing stuff that they did. As much as anything else, they just took things that are around in popular culture and co-opted them for their book, probably with the most innocent of intentions. But, as this thing has gone on, it has become clear that while neither I nor the authors could ever imagine this stuff as offensive – it clearly is. I think both they and I were embarrassingly wrong in not recognizing how potentially offensive this material is. And, I agree with Prof Rah, what is needed now is a complete turn-around by Zondervan and the authors. No doubt that would be costly, but it would also be the right thing to do. Better to lose some money than lose the respect, support, and relationships with those of other races.”
Very good point. I truly value this type of dialog, because we all obviously have opinions – and in many (maybe most) cases, we have assumptions. Venues such as this and open, constructive communication such as this, can lead to greater understanding. Which I feel I now have.
Thank you, Daniel, for sharing your thoughts and that quote.
And thanks again to Ed for providing the right venue for the right kind of discussion.
Blessings.
Very well written and a great review of what is happening and then giving your thoughts.
I am in total agreement with your views here in the way things were handled as well as putting myself in the shoes of Mike and Jud. I cannot imagine working on something so hard and then to have it cause so much pain and frustration.
I added your blog to my GoogleReader and look forward to more post from you.
Thanks for writing a great post…sometimes things get out of hand in the commenting sections and now on tweets and blogs…
I agree with the content of what Professor Rah is saying. But I can’t agree with how he goes about trying to expose things that are wrong with White Evangelical culture.
If I am reading his post correctly this is the content of his initial email to one of the authors :
Really guys,
What is the point of making an allusion to “Kung Fu” and having a dragon on the cover. You need to respect the culture. Not mock the culture.
Then he posts the ensuing thread, using it as an example of how wrong and blind the authors are.
This initial email is condescending and rude. How many people can honestly say they wouldn’t get defensive after receiving this email? Can we really say that he is speaking the truth in love here?
I fully acknowledge that white Christian culture needs to change, but I just don’t know if this is the way to go about it. It seems like the equivalent of a stranger getting in your face and yelling “YOU SUCK!” and then expecting you to be open to their concerns about you.
Ed – once again – I applaud your grace in the face of the chaos that is our journey to be reconciled to Him and to one another. I appreciate your acknowledgement of the “squemishness around the necessary part of the protest” – this is real and raw vulnerability that we all feel -those of us with the goal of racial reconciliation.
Love, love, love all the perspectives represented on the comments.
I will again state , as I have before, that we must tread forward with grace and humility as we confront the ugliness that is racial bias, injustice, bigotry – etc. etc. It is an education process where we all have to come in with our eyes and ears wide open to hear other views, perspectives and lay down our “right to be right”.
Thanks again for making your blog a safe place to get it all out…
[…] 5, 2009 by Edward Gilbreath Good news regarding the Deadly Viper controversy that has occupied a lot of our attention this week. Here’s the beginning of Soong-Chan […]
[…] “Shock and awe”. My good friend Ed Gilbreath used this phrase in his blog reflection. I love the way Ed writes – very descriptive and on point. I don’t think that there was […]
I know, from my experience directing promotion/communications for Urbana conventions (in 90’s) and as a majority culture leader, my posture had to be humble & open at all times. Seeking feedback, constantly.
It’s a shame that Zondervan’s editors aren’t more cross-cultural and representative of minorities and women. The fact that people read & liked this book without offense only highlights how clueless we whites can be. Which is why we can’t have all the power.
Righteous anger, necessary. Prophetic voices, necessary. Risk-taking, bridge-builders, absolutely necessary. I so admire these beautiful people, willing AGAIN, to say “this is wrong!” The fatigue of being in this role is huge, which I only know a small part as a female.
[…] Deadly Assumptions, by Edward Gilbreath […]
If the book’s focus were instead on white southern culture (a sort of parody on life as a redneck and what we as Christians can learn from that) I guarantee there’d be an outcry from Birmingham.
[…] Zondervan made a major announcement yesterday regarding the Deadly Viper Character Assassins book that was the source of so much anger and controversy recently. Effective immediately, Zondervan undertook the […]
[…] Zondervan made a major announcement yesterday regarding the Deadly Viper Character Assassins book that was the source of so much anger and controversy recently. Effective immediately, Zondervan undertook the […]
[…] viper’s blog site (find Soong Chan’s comment about 8 down) or on other blogs like reconcilliationblog or eugenecho or charleslee. There is incredible dialogue (with the requisite share of vulgarity, […]
As I web site possessor I believe the content material here is rattling great , appreciate it for your hard work. You should keep it up forever! Good Luck. gfaeeeekddgb