Any Christian college or university has an obligation to remain loyal to its core values and constituencies and to maintain theological coherence. To override those commitments could be a disservice to the university in the long run. I did find several excellent posts from other bloggers who were on top of this story. This one from Rachel at her blog, Momentary Trace, is poignant and insightful. And this report from The Grand Rapids Press offers a somewhat hopeful update.
Is This Really Happening at Calvin College?
January 30, 2008 by Edward Gilbreath
Where have you been, my Reconciliation Blog peeps?! Once again, I’m learning about a hot topic way late in the game. You’re supposed to be telling me about this stuff, especially now that I’m away from the pulse of evangelical happenings (i.e., Christianity Today).
Anyway, have any of you been tracking the story of Calvin College faculty member Denise Isom? Isom, who is African American, is an assistant professor of education whose request to worship at a predominantly black Baptist church was denied by the Calvin board. Check out this CT story for all the grisly details. When my coworker LaTonya Taylor brought this story to my attention, I had to read it several times before I could really believe it. Was I missing something? Apparently not.
Isom’s ordeal saddens and angers me. It has elements of some of the worst “Reconciliation Blues“ stories that I’ve ever heard, both before and after writing the book. How could something like this be happening at a contemporary evangelical college, especially one with such a forward-thinking reputation as Calvin?
When I read the CT article, I was reminded of a question that was posed to me by an African American faculty member of another Christian Reformed school. She asked, “Is racial reconciliation truly possible on an institutional level?” She was frustrated by the words of one of her college’s administrators who told her matter-of-factly that the school’s board of trustees would always be made up of those who were movers and shakers in the Christian Reformed denomination, that someone who didn’t fit this profile wouldn’t even be considered. To this woman’s mind, that was the same as saying “White males will be the only people considered for board membership at this college.” And this was at a school that had expressed a strong desire to become more racially and culturally diverse. Good luck with that.
The Calvin College board ruled that upholding its denominational requirement for tenure-track faculty was crucial to the school remaining a Reformed institution. They wrote in a statement: ”Nearly all Christian colleges and universities that distanced themselves from their founding denominations and theological traditions eventually also drifted away from being Christian in any meaningful way.” This line of reasoning seems to assume a superiority over other denominations and implies that the Baptist beliefs of Isom’s church will somehow undermine the mission of Calvin College. Yet, like that other Reformed school noted above, Calvin proclaims a commitment to racial diversity.
The American evangelical church acknowledged and (for the most part) rejected its practice of overt racism long ago. But something sinister still lurks within our institutions. Could denominational and theological tradition be one of the last barriers to true racial reconciliation among evangelicals today? A quote in the CT article from Olivet Nazarene University president John Bowling makes me wonder:
In my opinion any theological tradition that cannot take into account the realities of the culture in which that theology is being lived out and make adjustments where tradition clearly falls short, lacks the grace and love that God is calling us to. “So accept each other just as Christ has accepted you; then God will be glorified” (Rom. 15:7).
Hadn’t heard about this story until now. Sad, and painful to read about.
You may have hit the target, Ed, with your comment about how theological and denominational barriers so often inhibit true reconciliation and true shalom. Turning a blind eye to the present only obscures more; and your application of Rom. 15:7 is right on.
A quest for denominational and theological precision can fully and totally miss the relational dynamic of the gospel. Jesus is trampled. I have a quiver full of stories on this one, and it leaves such a sour taste in my mouth.
The link to the latest GRP article does seem more hopeful, however, and I applaud Rachel at Momentary Trace for speaking up too.
Thanks for the info Ed. I too am saddened by this incident.
I understand Calvin’s desire to maintain theological consistency, but it seems that in this circumstance that their rigidity could be softened.
The difficult thing is that if they want to maintain their Reformed tradition they cannot make allowances like this all the time. The root issue is not what Calvin and Isom experienced, it is with the cultural competency of the denomination.
A college can want to be ethnicity diverse, but if the denomination that is supporting that college is not pursing diversity as well, the goal of the college is constrained. A denominational college/university will not be much more diverse than it’s denomination’s churches are (this is seen by John Browling’s comment in the Christianity Today article).
The fault is on the denomination, they should strive to have more churches that feel comfortable to people of a variety of ethnicities. Divisive Theological differences don’t seem to be the main barrier for reconciliation. The problem usually is not being able to diversely apply theological beliefs within and across a range of cultures.
The fear - I think denominations as well as many Christian organizations have -is that culture and theological beliefs are inextricably linked. While there appears to be a correlation, creating a church or Christian organization that reflects a variety of culture does not have to endanger a theological base.
Naw, I hadn’t heard about this one. Tragic, Tragic!
This sounds more prejudice than anything else. There are African Americans and Anglos that are Reformed Baptist. I’m offering an explanation, not an excuse. It doesn’t sound like this institution attempted to do its home work. And for the denominational separtist approach, from a theological standpoint sounds pretty cultic to me. And for those that are reformed in their theology (I decided to ditch both terms, reformed, calvinist) this is another racial sock in the eye, just like the good ol’ boys from together 4 the gospel.
The part of this that is also wrenching is that Professor Isom apparently had an either/or choice because none of the churches she might have chosen to attend in order to comply with the college’s rules had been working on becoming multiethnic, at least not long enough that they were viable options. So even if she ‘bought’ the rationale for the rule, she still didn’t really have a choice. It just makes me sad for my brothers and sisters out there. As a pastor in an increasingly multicultural church (close to 50% now) with leadership at all levels that reflects that, I know that the gains are great and outweigh the adjustments and pain that change causes. I have more confidence in praying for the Reformed churches around Calvin to have a heart-change and to become restless and unhappy with their monochromatic church communities than I have in praying for the “top brass”.
Denise was a co-worker and friend of mine at North Park. I am sorry to hear of what can only be a very painful situation for her personally.
the reality of the ongoing pain for those who take racial reconciliation seriously is apparent in this unfortunate story. In some ways this type of thing within large, white, Reformed institutions is to be expected. On the other hand it is such a mystery to me how the Reformed tradition itself doesn’t undermine this type of insanity.
There is risk for any tradition to open its doors yet as others have said here including Ed, the upside to opening up oneself and one’s tradition to others is wonderfully more full of grace than the alternative closing ourselves to all else. I can only assume there will be an enormous sense of unanticipated loss following Dr. Isom’s departure.
I disagree with our brother above about the school not being able to make such allowances and remain thoroughly Reformed. What one confesses can be assessed much more directly than where one goes to church. As an anglo who is Presbyterian and Reformed at heart, I attend a Black Baptist Church because of my need to be led by an African American pastor. The traditional black church has more in common with the Reformed tradition’s understanding of social justice, justification and many other crucial doctrines than many liberal or luke warm reformed churches!
I haven’t read the article, but I can say that this reminds me of many other things that Christian colleges uphold in the name of focus. Really, one could argue both ways about such things. And of course ethnicity isn’t the only thing that might get blanketed in the process. Family style, culture, gender and so forth also are eclipsed in these scenarios. And yet. Maybe the answer isn’t always to ask the institution to change their focus. Never an easy solution, which makes pain an unavoidable part of the process.
I’m just read the article. How sad. Dr. Isom’s situation is one of the many things that scares me about mainstream evangelicalism. It’s seems like all talk (doctrinally) but no feet moving under that mouth. Sometimes I wonder why I consider myself “evangelical”. It seems black Christians are more tolerated by liberal Protestantism though many black Christian would disagree with the theology of the liberals in the mainlines.
Just learning about your blog and playing some catch up here!
I too am saddened by this situation and it is in incidences like this that make me aware that there is so much work to be done. I agree that Dr. Bowling’s comments are a bit disturbing as well. Thanks again and great writing! I will be stopping by frequently.
Hello to all the new visitors here. Thanks so much for chiming in with your comments. I’ll be speaking at Calvin’s Festival of Faith and Writing in April. It’s a wonderful event. If you love books and writing, I’d encourage you to attend. Anyway, since I’ll be sharing about my book, this topic may likely come up. I must add that I do not look at this particular incident as being representative of Calvin as a whole. Overall, I think it’s a great school. I’m just a little confused by the leadership’s thinking on this one.
I can’t comment on this particular situation, but I think there has to be something done to increase communication between Bible believing African American churches and majority white evangelical congregations.
I know I need to learn more. I think many white evangelicals are wary of accepting the theology of black congregations because the only time we see them is when they accept a liberal politician to speak in their pulpit and it makes the news. I think because of this we may lump them in with liberal mainline denominations undeservingly.
Our church has developed a limited partership with an African American congregation and I think it’s been very helpful, although limited to this point.
[...] The best information on the topic can be found at the source here [...]
There is a positive side to Calvin’s rigidity. Calvin requires a committment to the reformed tradition, but not to a set of positions on the hot theological issues of the day. By making the requirement a denominational one, they can allow their faculty to be more diverse in their views, and allow the institution to stay grounded while their faculty are truely free to explore different ideas.
I think everyone at Calvin is very sad that this situation worked out the way it did, even if they agree with the decision.
[...] Still, the tenure issue has long bothered me. Edward Gilbreath posted the blog piece below and here at his blog addressing the issue of tenure at a conservative Christian college. I have blogged [...]
Here’s an update to the story in today’s GR Press:
http://www.mlive.com/news/grpress/index.ssf?/base/news-42/1211289327199590.xml&coll=6
Yes, Dr. Isom has left Calvin and taken a position elsewhere–but along with her two additional education department professors left in protest of the adminstration’s decision.
Wow, thanks for that update Beth.
It seems like there is a lot of lessons to be learned from this whole episode. One of the nuggets of gold is in that last quote about how the church that the school felt Isom must abandon was above all her greatest support.
That is sadly ironic. . . preserve the ecclesiastical tradition by cutting off the effective local church’s ministry.
Calvin is fortunate to be in the U. S. of A. where Religious Freedom is supposed to be a fundamental right protected by law!
They will suffer, their time will come. What goes around comes around!
Those responsible should be ashamed!
They are not following respected biblical principles!
I assume the “DEFENDANT” did not cross the school’s goals in the classroom and was otherwise teaching as required. A respectable life outside the classroom should be all that is required. Maybe the defendant could get a reasonable retirement under the law with the help of appropriate legal help.
J.
6/28/2008 1:58 PM
oh, and check again the statement the school issued, which I find to be completely rhetorical, and categorically misleading, at that:
”Nearly all Christian colleges and universities that distanced themselves from their founding denominations and theological traditions eventually also drifted away from being CHRISTIAN in any meaningful way.”
(I added the all-caps…
Change the all-caps to another word… “DENOMINATIONAL”. Then you might have something. In which case… would that be all bad?
The statement seems to assert that there is no difference between “founding denominations” and “theological traditions”. It really gets me going when I hear the mainline American “Protestant” denominations clinging so rigidly to their “theological traditions”. I just want to stop and ask them… “So, then… why aren’t you Catholic? Or maybe Orthodox? Or, at least Lutheran? At what point did ‘their’ traditions stop being ‘yours’?”
Any time I see such hard-line denominationalism (if that is a word) that seems to fly in the face of Christ’s message of grace and Godly wisdom, one word comes to mind: PHARISEE.
(Whew! this one gets me going…
Sorry about the excessive smiley face guys… not sure why those are showing up… might be a Mac-translation thing…